Light bulbs siphon a lot of juice out of the grid, which makes them perfect targets for anyone trying to conserve power. Compact fluorescents (CFLs) have been leading the charge, armed with mercury vapor and phosphor that emits far more light per watt than hot incandescent bulbs. But they’re toxic and expensive, so engineers are looking for alternatives.

Enter LEDs, light-emitting diodes. They can be twice as efficient as CFLs and 10 times as efficient as incandescent bulbs. But they’re expensive, complex structures of gallium nitride crystals, reflectors and even sapphires. Until now. Researchers at Perdue University have figured out how to make LEDs using good-old silicon wafers. The new process could mean LEDs that compete, price-wise, with CFLs and even incandescent bulbs. And the new LEDs are efficient—between 47 to 64 percent efficient. Compare that to an incandescent bulb’s paltry 10 percent and you can see how the new lights could save a ton of electricity.

That’s not all. LED manufacturer OSRAM has developed a new LED that’s significantly brighter than existing bulbs. They’ve managed to push 500 lumens out of a single 1-mm-square LED. To put things into perspective, a 100-watt incandescent bulb puts out about 1700 lumens. The new LEDs are also extremely efficient, cranking out about 136 lumens per watt. Again, a 100-watt incandescent only manages about 17 or 18 lumens per watt. OSRAM plans to put the new bulbs on the market within a year. Possible uses include small projectors, automobile lights and interior lighting for the home.

If that wasn’t enough, the startup Vu1 is producing a new type of light bulb altogether. They’re called ESL (electron stimulated luminescence) and they use electrons to directly stimulate a layer of phosphorus on the inside of a bulb. It’s the same technology that makes the old-timey tube TVs glow. The company claims that their bulbs emit about 40 lumens per watt. The light, they say, matches incandescent light in color and quality. The bulbs should be available in September 2008 for about $12 a piece. Not cheap, but on par with the price of a dim-able CFL.

So what difference will all these newfangled bulbs make? The US uses a third of its energy for lighting. Engineers at Perdue estimate that switching out incandescent bulbs could cut US energy consumption by about 10 percent.

Link to TreeHugger article.

Link to Gizmodo article.

Link to Gizmodo article.

Turns out that your average plasma TV sucks more electricity from the grid than those fancy new plug-in hybrid cars that are coming on the market. According to officials at the Electric Power Research Institute who were quoted in a recent Associated Press article, big-screen plasma TVs drain about four times as much power as plug-in hybrids.

Why should you care? It means that the U.S. power grid is capable of handling a few million plug-in hybrids without blowing its gigantic, irreplaceable fuse. The logic goes something like this: Consumers have purchased millions of big-screen plasma sets during the past few years. They’ve all plugged them in and probably leave them on for HOURS each day. Plug-in hybrids, on the other hand, will likely be plugged in during off-peak hours, late at night while most people sleep and when the grid isn’t being taxed. 

The grid may be able to handle plug-in cars, but we’ll still need to generate more electricity to meet their demands. Hopefully that energy will come from solar and wind rather than coal-fired power plants.

Link to GlobeAuto story.

Before swarms of nanites can organize to eradicate the human race, they’ll need a leader. Engineers in Japan have made the first steps in creating such a microscopic overlord, building a nanomachine that imitates human brain cells. The tiny machine can receive information from the macro world and transmit it to a small cadre of its companions. Working in concert, teams of the molecular contraptions could do everything from terminate tumors to crunch vast amounts of data in the blink of an eye.

Dr. Anirban Bandyopadhyay of the International Center for Young Scientists, in Tsukuba, Japan, led the team that developed the nanobrain. It’s made from 17 molecules of an compound called duroquinone, 16 arranged in orbit around one. The whole thing is held together by weak hydrogen bonds. Using a scanning electron microscope, Bandyopadhyay was able to send electrical impulses to the central molecule to change its configuration or state. The lead molecule then transfers its state to the other 16, like dominoes falling one after another.

It’s basically parallel processing on a micro scale, the same kind of number crunching that our brains are capable of. In fact, Bandyopadhyay modeled the microbrain on human glial cells, which pass info between neurons in the brain. They call it “one-to-many computation” and it’s key to parallel processing.

So what can it do? Bandyopadhyay estimates that the simple assembly is capable of generating more than 4 billion different outcomes from one input instruction. There’s no comparing true parallel processing to current processors, which crunch computations linearly. Parallel processors can take on millions of lines of instruction at once. That’s the kind of computing power that can keep Moore’s Law of exponential computing growth chugging away into stratospheric heights. 

And it’s not just powerful—the nanocomputer would represent a completely new way of computing. It’s purely visual, using patterns to replace the differential equations that are at the heart of current computing.

There’s also a potential to manufacture billions of molecules of a custom drug with just one instruction. Imagine a single drop of water hitting a placid pool. Waves radiate out from the site of impact, quickly covering the entire surface. A single instruction dropped into a field of similar nanomachines would spread in the same manner.

Bandyopadhyay is currently working to create more complex versions of his nanobrain and hopes to have a functional computer within a few years. The trick is finding something other than a massive tunneling electron microscope to interact with the machines. Bandyopadhyay hopes other control methods will be developed, including optical readers for the nanocomputers, or chemical triggers for the medical nanofactories.

Link to MSNBC article.

Link to BBC article.

Photo Credit: Rensselaer/Koratkar

Cover the insides of your boiler with copper nanorods and you’ll increase its steam output by a factor of 30, granting your fire-breathing steam-turbine velocipede the supersonic speeds befitting its polished-brass fittings. Researchers at the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute made the discovery by accident, not while tinkering in their anachronistic steampunk workshops, but while conducting routine experiments with nanoparticles. The team sprayed an invisible forest of the miniscule copper rods on the bottom of a vessel. They soon realized that water boiled in the special pot turned to steam much faster than water boiled in a plain old tea kettle. 

The trick? If you want steam, you need water and air. Boiling water turns to steam only where it comes into contact with air. In a regular pot, all of the water can be hot enough to boil, but only a fraction of it is in contact with air. The forest of copper nanorods traps air molecules, which means far more water in contact with air. It’s effective: Nanorod-coated pots produce 3,000 percent more bubbles and a ton more steam than run-of-the-mill pots.

At first glance the discovery seems only relevant to steam engine buffs. But most of our electricity generated by steam turbines: coal or natural gas heats water to produce steam that turns turbines that spins generators that produce electricity. The copper nanorods could mean more efficient steam production, which means burning less coal or natural gas. It makes most power sources get cheaper. 

Nikhil A. Koratkar, associate professor in the Department of Mechanical, Aerospace, and Nuclear Engineering at Rensselaer:

“If the time taken to boil a given quantity of water is reduced by an order of magnitude, that should translate into significant cost savings” 

Link to Rensselaer release.

Researchers in the EU-funded research consortium CONTACT have built a printer that can lay down LCD displays on virtually any substrate, from plastic to paper to fabric. The new printer can spit out displays in any shape, freeing gadget designers to create more organic forms.

Their new printer, dubbed Labratester 2, will be able to print a tiny TFT matrix on any material, then follow up with an LCD matrix. The process should allow cheap digital displays that could be printed on eyeglasses, clothing or anything else.

Link to ScienceDaily article.

Researchers at the Zernike Institute of Advanced Materials at the University of Groningen have developed super-cheap plastic memory that will likely end up in next-gen RFID tags. It works like Flash memory, but it’s easier and cheaper to manufacture. How do they do it? Flash memory is like a club sandwich—layers of semiconductors between ferro-electric toast. The new memory mixes everything up into one blended semiconductor cake. Current can be channeled through the mixture, leaving programming in its wake. The researchers aren’t totally clear on how they’ve managed this feat, but they say it works wonderfully.

Link to ScienceDaily article.

A newly designed nanomotor could be used to craft custom molecules one atom at a time, like a molecular ink jet printer. The motor, designed by Colin Lambert and his team at Lancaster University in the UK, would be constructed using three carbon nanotubes—one suspended between two others. A stream of electrons would spin the central tube, like a waterwheel in a river. 

Researchers claim they could pump atoms through the central tube, controlling chemical reactions to form exotic molecules with unfathomable properties. The motors could also be tiny, tiny computer components—using the positions of individual atoms within the central tube to represent ones and zeroes. The components would be incredibly dense, about 10 times as small as current processors and memory chips.

Researchers say that the motors should be pretty easy to build.

No news on whether they could be used to build indestructible colonies of nanites that would eventually devour the human race, however.

Link to NewScientist article.

Fuse nanoparticles of cellulose in a tight matrix and you’ll end up with paper that’s tougher than cast iron. Professor Lars Berglund at the Swedish Royal Institute of Technology in Stokholm made the discovery while searching for a better use of cellulose, the most abundant plant material on the planet. Currently, most cellulose is used to make paper products or as filler in other materials. It’s the stuff that gives plant cells their structure, long sugar molecules that form durable cell walls.

Processing cellulose usually turns it to mush, which is why your typical strong man can tear a phone book in two without breaking a sweat. Berglund developed a gentle process that uses enzymes and a mechanical beater to ease cellulose molecules out of wood pulp. The pristine cellulose forms extremely strong hydrogen bonds when dried, giving the material a tensile strength of about 214 megapascals. That’s greater than cast iron (130 MPa) and not far off from structural steel (250 MPa). Compare that to run-of-the-mill paper, which has a tensile strength of less than 1 MPa.

No word on potential uses for the material, but it could turn out to be the best renewable building material yet discovered.

Link to NewScientist article.